Comments on: 300 is not manly :(

By: ram

ram — Fri, 31 Aug 2007 05:57:40 +0000

i bought it on dvd and saw it yesterday the first time, to me it was pretty interesting, much like sin city, it wont stand the test of time tho….

By: wildarmsheero

wildarmsheero — Sat, 18 Aug 2007 14:35:59 +0000

It lacks God Fingers, and is therefore un-manly.

By: TheBigN

TheBigN — Sat, 18 Aug 2007 06:50:53 +0000

I came into the theater with little expectations for 300, and I walked away from it having a good time watching it. I didn’t expect it to be accurate or make sense (it’s not/it doesn’t), I did expect it to be dramatic (very), and I wanted it to be entertaining (it was). So I don’t know~

By: Cloro

Cloro — Sat, 18 Aug 2007 06:16:20 +0000

nah 300 sucked even with the historical references they did what they wanted and ruined the movie and the second halve of the movie its kinda boring.

300 its not worth to be bought. IMO

By: plounted

plounted — Fri, 17 Aug 2007 14:17:43 +0000

well now.
you can go comparing everything to g gundam because that would be unfair.
300 just looked nice. rippling and airbrushed nice.

By: roast-beefy

roast-beefy — Fri, 17 Aug 2007 05:13:06 +0000

“It was just dumb :(”

Dumb? THIS IS HOLLYWOOD!

Hollywood sucks.

By: digitalboy

digitalboy — Fri, 17 Aug 2007 05:11:53 +0000

Heh, I can’t decide if you’re serious or not ^^;;

By: Mike

Mike — Fri, 17 Aug 2007 04:17:40 +0000

The movie was OK–forgettable for me. You should have seen the huge number of 300 references at the Masquerade at Anime Expo this year though. If I’d heard one more “Madness? THIS…IS…!” I was ready to go Spartan on someone myself. :-p

By: wildarmsheero

wildarmsheero — Fri, 17 Aug 2007 03:30:21 +0000

Well I just hate all movies that aren’t over 20 years old.

By: digitalboy

digitalboy — Fri, 17 Aug 2007 03:16:56 +0000

For once, WAH, I disagree with you. I love that movie…